Difference between revisions of "Template talk:News"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Sixth Season?!: new section) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Sixth Season?! == | == Sixth Season?! == | ||
[http://www.inquisitr.com/18383/futurama-might-return-to-fox/ Make it news!] | [http://www.inquisitr.com/18383/futurama-might-return-to-fox/ Make it news!] <small>-- the preceding unsigned comment was written by [[User:Buddy13|Buddy13]]{{#if:| before {{{2}}}|}}.</small> | ||
:"Might" is also an indicator for speculation. Also, Buddy, you can see my analysis of it at [http://www.futurama-madhouse.com.ar/#1235665510,95360, the Madhouse]. --'''[[User:Svip|Svip]]'''<sup>[[User talk:Svip|Talk]]</sup> 00:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:40, 27 February 2009
News is more important than new Infosphere pages. Perhaps as old items are dropped, they could be added to a News Archive? Thoughts? --Buddy 15:42, 8 July 2007 (PDT)
- Sounds like a good idea. --SvipTalk 15:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT)
- I don't think anyone will call that a bad idea. I'll go ahead and put the old news into the archive. - Quolnok 17:58, 8 July 2007 (PDT)
Another screenjabber review
I'd add it, but I don't know where to stick the item that falls off the bottom. It's here. There are some spoilers, but he claims he's being more careful about that. --Buddy 01:36, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
- Uhm, Buddy. That's the exact same review we already have on the news bulletin. Are you drunk? --SvipTalk 13:45, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Sixth Season?!
Make it news! -- the preceding unsigned comment was written by Buddy13.
- "Might" is also an indicator for speculation. Also, Buddy, you can see my analysis of it at the Madhouse. --SvipTalk 00:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)